I think it might work better with more narrow sectors. Say 30� or 35�.
That should improve the adjacent sector interference, and I think the
narrow gaps in between sectors would be small enough to not be too
problematic.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 4/7/2016 4:37 AM, Craig Schmaderer wrote:
Maybe it was just some wierd day. But i stacked 2 90degree sectors on
top of each other and without a 5 mhz gaurd band it seamed that we had
at least enough effect on signal quality because all sms could hear
both aps and vice versa or was i just being crazy that day? And the
band touching was just too close. I guess to this day i try not
directly overlapping antennas unless i know i have a 20mhz channel to
seperate them. Imputs?
Craig schmaderer
Skywave Wireless, Inc.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:50 PM -0700, "Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us
<mailto:af...@zirkel.us>> wrote:
Even at 60*its possible ;)
-Sean
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Scott Vander Dussen <sc...@velociter.net
<mailto:sc...@velociter.net>> wrote:
450 APs, 9x 40* sectors. Is ABCABCABC channel reuse realistic?
Thanks,
Scott
