We are taking a Cisco switch out there to see what happens. Personally I think the port on the Cisco is bad.
Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 7:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Connecting to a a Cisco Firewall Never seen this with ASA. We use the smaller ASAs with 100M at customer sites without issues. Connected different Servers and Mikrotik Routers including GE-Interfaces. Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Rory Conaway Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. April 2016 16:15 An: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Betreff: [AFMUG] Connecting to a a Cisco Firewall Anyone have problems with staying connected to a Cisco AS Firewall with 100Mbps? We had troubles with the Mimosa B5-Lite, at first it was fine for a few days, then started dropping the connection on the Ethernet port, then it pretty much went offline completely. We put a TS-5 in there as a quick test and it ran 24 hours, same thing this morning. The B5-Lite and the TS-5 seem to be working perfectly and we don't have a problem with the B5-Lite attached to the Netonix on the other side. We have tried forcing all devices to 100Mbsp and it works for a while. In this case, setting it back to Auto on the T@-5 brought it back online. At this point, we are telling the client the port is bad on the Cisco since this is 2 devices with the same problem. Is this common when attaching to Cisco 100Mbps devices with 1Gbps ports? Rory Conaway * Triad Wireless * CEO 4226 S. 37th Street * Phoenix * AZ 85040 602-426-0542 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.triadwireless.net<http://www.triadwireless.net/> "I wish I could play little league now. I'd be way better than before."
