Good point!  I forgot about the 900 fsk being 2.5ms

-Sean

On Thursday, April 7, 2016, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

> Or a 900 MHz 450i that you are trying to coordinate timing with a 900 FSK
> system, either your own during transition, or a competitor.
>
> *From:* Sean Heskett <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:09 AM
> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 2.5 or 5 Frame Question
>
> They only time you want to use 5ms frames is to sync with a WiMAX
> platform.  Otherwise just stay at 2.5ms.
>
> -Sean
>
> On Thursday, April 7, 2016, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc <
> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok Geeks,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a simple question that we cannot get a straight answer on.
>> (different answers)
>>
>>
>>
>> Scenario:
>>
>>
>>
>> ePMP BH – running 2.5ms 1gb
>>
>> 5Ghz 450 AP – running 2.5 ms 1gb
>>
>> 3.65Ghz 450 AP – running 2.5 ms 1gb
>>
>> 2.4 FSK AP – running 5ms 100Mb
>>
>> 1GB Sync
>>
>> MT 450 1GB acting as switch
>>
>>
>>
>> WILL the FSK customers see issues or not on that 5ms or does it matter
>> once it hits the switch?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Tyson Burris, President*
>> *Internet Communications Inc.*
>> *739 Commerce Dr.*
>> *Franklin, IN 46131*
>>
>> *317-738-0320 Daytime #*
>> *317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #*
>> *Online: **www.surfici.net* <http://www.surfici.net>
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: ICI]
>>
>> *What can ICI do for you?*
>>
>>
>> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones -
>> IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*
>>
>> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
>> *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
>> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
>> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
>> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
>> *prohibited.*
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to