Panels are such crap antenna designs though. So sloppy. On Apr 14, 2016 9:06 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> wouldn't it be more practical to just use one dual polarity panel? > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Why? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Apr 14, 2016 9:28 PM, "Jay Weekley" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dumb idea. How about two, 45 degree, single pole panels? >>> >>> On April 14, 2016 8:13:34 PM CDT, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey if you have ideas throw them out ;) >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Apr 14, 2016 8:22 PM, "Joshaven Mailing Lists" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Any H&V antenna no? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sincerely, >>>>> Joshaven Potter >>>>> Google Hangouts: [email protected] >>>>> Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 14, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone have a suggestion for a small AP antenna? Previously with >>>>> Ubnt we would do an NSM5. This would give us 45*. The use case is just >>>>> to >>>>> service a few homes around the corner from the trees. >>>>> >>>>> The original integrated radios are 30* but they're EOLed and the Force >>>>> 180 are only 15* azimuth. Great for CPEs but not that good for APs. >>>>> >>>>> Short of buying a connectorized AP and a 90* sector, I'm not sure what >>>>> my other options are. Any thoughts or ideas would be appreciated! >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>> >> >
