Well yeah, I guess that's what I was trying to say. Just think of the 4096 as a bonus, it's nice when it's in that nodulation, but realistically any FDD throughout claims in Mbps from a marketing department are closer to fluff than operational reality. On Apr 15, 2016 2:15 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
I can take a 4096 radio, add engineering and come up with a 1024 performing radio (or a 4096 performing radio). I can't turn a 1024 radio into a 4096 radio. Radio, antenna and band selection as appropriate for the uptime at performance levels required. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ------------------------------ *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> *To: *[email protected] *Sent: *Friday, April 15, 2016 4:12:31 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AlfoPlus2 Keeping in mind 4096qam requires a really high RSL like -50, so it's better to think of it as a 1024qam radio. Don't engineer link capacity needs based on 80MHz wide 4096... It'll be in 4096 maybe 99.5% of the year. Done right it can be in 1024 at five nines. On Apr 15, 2016 11:39 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, what do they get at a 112 MHz channel instead of an 80 MHz channel? > Europe has 112 MHz channels available now. Before, SIAE had some very good > spec sheets, so ask for them. > > I also think they can do 4096QAM? 4096 QAM and 112 MHz channels might get > you there. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Peter Kranz" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Friday, April 15, 2016 12:47:09 PM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] AlfoPlus2 > > Has anyone worked with the SIAE AlfoPlus2 yet? They promise “ALFOplus2 > full outdoor solution offers 2Gbps guaranteed throughput, enabling > successful launch of LTE, by providing best TCO while boosting capacity and > availability of the network.” > > > > And > > > > “first full outdoor supporting up to two channels at 80/112MHz in single > ODU” > > > > I can’t quite figure out how they are getting 2 Gbps.. > > > > 1x80Mhz Channel at 2048QAM = 623 Mbps in my book > > 2x80Mhz Channel at 2048QAM = 1245 Mbps > > > > So are they really using 4 channels? > > > > Channel 1 HxV for 1245 > > Channel 2 HxV for 1245 > > > > Total = 2490 Mbps.. > > > > > *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207-0000 > [email protected] > > > >
