I like them even more because like everything, we pushed it too far, we decided on epmp for offloading the short LOS customers. was supposed to be a 2 mile limit with an assumption wed push it to 4. with the cambium sectors we are consistently hitting 6-8 miles and sidelobing the shit out of it, good for up front offloading, but in the long term we are killing the AP, and the in town customers are suffering because theyre under the pattern, move to these, get our cheating reeled in and better performance on the short shots with the 90s and come back in with the 30s for the further customers, EPMP is so cheap that its cost effective to put up one of these 30s for a single customer knowing we will eventually get some more, but we get to target locations and minimize unnecessary rf pollution. Plus, its great PR when you do an NLOS but say "let us see what we can do" and we can call them back later that day after we make the decision and tell them "hey, we love you, we are so awesome and pretty that we will go hang a whole new access point just for you, because we like you and we have big junk. This tiny form factor is such that we could toss a roll of cable in the van and hang the thing that day and maybe even make it back in the afternoon to the customer.
all assuming they actually work as advertised On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > If your sectors are crowded this is a good additional antenna to offload > some nearby customers. Small compared to a sector good fb ratio and sharp > edges to reduce interference. 30 degree makes most sense. They are built > solid compared to other rf elements antennas. > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Von: Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > Datum: 16.04.2016 03:35 (GMT+01:00) > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements Symmetrical Horns vs Traditional Sectors > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
