So, the issue, is that they enforced policy that they originally thought
they could try to let you slide on.  IPPay has no control over
VISA/MC/AMEX, so when they say no, it's their fault.  Got it.  I'll bow out
of this one, because I fail to see the logic of breaking the rules, getting
caught, they tried to help, and then they couldn't process the
transaction.  Now you quit doing business with them over a non-business
related transaction.  I've worked with probably 15 different merchant
processors over the last 20 years, and none of them have ever allowed
this.  I wouldn't quit a company that wouldn't help me break card
processing rules, even if they originallly tried to help me break them.




On Sunday, April 17, 2016, Jason McKemie <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The issue is how it was handled.
>
> On Saturday, April 16, 2016, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> Um, so if you don't seewhy this isn't allowed, I don't know what to say.
>> And to quit a processor over running an unnatural charge that wasn't a
>> normal part of your charge history is crazy.  I bet they tried to help you
>> and thats why the runnaround only to be told by their bank that its a
>> no-no.  Its also in most merchant agreements.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, April 16, 2016, Jason McKemie <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I would have done the same thing.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, April 16, 2016, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, but this is a ridiculous reason to leave IPPay.  Also, it is a
>>>> grey area when it comes to legality.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:55 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ther may be ftc regulations that would create a criminal liability for
>>>>> processors allowing kiting
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Tyson @ Internet Communications Inc
>>>>> (ICI) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> My 2 cents:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who cares! The merchant gets their damn money.  Unless you have some
>>>>>> kind of charge back history, it's stupid.   The only thing I will say, as
>>>>>> an outsider, if you did it for the rewards perk...why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doesn't the reward get off set by the merchant fees?  It's a wash.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the intent was for something else, it's really none of their
>>>>>> business.  They make money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Disclaimer:  I don't use them
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Tyson Burris, President*
>>>>>>  *Internet Communications Inc.*
>>>>>>  *739 Commerce Dr.*
>>>>>>  *Franklin, IN 46131*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
>>>>>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
>>>>>> *Online: **www.surfici.net*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Forgive the brevity, the typos and my fat fingers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Scott Vander Dussen <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’ve received a few off-list request for my story and a couple here
>>>>>> on-list.  I don’t mind sharing, I just didn’t want to come out with a 
>>>>>> rant
>>>>>> about IPPay because that wasn’t my goal.  I share this experience 
>>>>>> because I
>>>>>> really value this list and the contributions made by all you wonderful
>>>>>> people.  Few things have shaped my business and been as valuable of a
>>>>>> resource as this list (beginning as Part-15.org <http://part-15.org>
>>>>>> to current), so thank you everyone!  (:  Part of that awesomeness is
>>>>>> sometimes sharing the less than stellar experiences we face, here’s mine
>>>>>> with IP Pay.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. I wanted to make a purchase that was not eligible for a CC payment
>>>>>> and get the cash back rewards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. I contacted Cap1 and asked if I could use one of those blank
>>>>>> “courtesy checks” they send out to write to myself and basically get a 
>>>>>> cash
>>>>>> advance plus then get the cash back rewards. They said no problem, but 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> checks are exempt from cash back rewards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. I asked if I as a business could run my own card into my own bank
>>>>>> account for the cash rewards.  She said no problem, I asked her to 
>>>>>> research
>>>>>> the Cap 1 Visa ToS to verify, she did and again no problem.  I then asked
>>>>>> her to triple verify by confirming with her supervisor, and again no
>>>>>> problem.  They said if you have that resource to process your own card 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> you’re paying your minimum balances etc. it’s a non-issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4. I researched “Credit Card Kiting” which is the process of paying a
>>>>>> credit card balance with another credit card- the practice is only a
>>>>>> problem when there is deception involved.  Even the Wikipedia article
>>>>>> demonstrates its OK when there is not deception.  And this isn’t even
>>>>>> kiting, it’s just processing a credit card for cash in the bank.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5. We process a card for $20k
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 6. Tanya Krapil from IPPay halts the transaction,  holds the funds
>>>>>> and emails me asking if it’s legit.  (lost a whole day of expected funds
>>>>>> because of this)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7. I reply it’s legit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 8. Tayan demands invoices and “documentation” before she will release
>>>>>> the funds.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 9. I reply: “We don't share our invoices with parties not involved
>>>>>> with the transaction, that is not only a breach of confidentiality but
>>>>>> inappropriate for you to ask. While I can appreciate your concern for 
>>>>>> fraud
>>>>>> I have, as the CEO of Velociter, already confirmed the legitimacy of this
>>>>>> transaction. If at this time you are cause further delays in processing
>>>>>> this transaction then I will consider your actions as unreasonable
>>>>>> non-performance and a termination of our long standing business
>>>>>> relationship.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 10. Tayna the replies that she will process this transaction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 11. Subsequently Tayna spoke telephonically with other staff and
>>>>>> determined the card was employee owned.  Tayna said she’d process the
>>>>>> payment but it isn’t a kosher practice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 12. Tayna then emails me to tell me just kidding, she’s not going to
>>>>>> process the payment after all. (losing yet another day of expected funds)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My grief is that on a $20k tag Tayna doesn’t bother to pick up the
>>>>>> phone and call, just arbitrarily held the funds and sent an email.  Then
>>>>>> she said two times that she would indeed process the payment only to then
>>>>>> change her mind later.  It’s horrible customer service to say one thing 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> then not honor it, even if you made a mistake.  I’m particularly bothered
>>>>>> by her asking for “invoices and documentation” to support the charge; the
>>>>>> US in particular is getting so used to sacrificing our privacy and
>>>>>> freedoms.  Tayna is demanding I send over information that completely out
>>>>>> of her sphere of concern.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tayna is citing that it’s a Visa policy not process your own card,
>>>>>> but has provided no documentation to support that.  There is no deception
>>>>>> involved, we called and pre-authorized the transaction with Cap1 on a
>>>>>> recorded call and Cap1 gave their blessing.  I contract with IPPay to
>>>>>> process the CC cards I enter, nothing more.  Even if there is some 
>>>>>> obscure
>>>>>> Visa ToS that prohibits this transaction for this specific reason (this 
>>>>>> is *
>>>>>> *not** credit card kiting) Tayna’s lack of professionalism and the
>>>>>> subsequent headache it’s caused me finished my company’s business
>>>>>> relationship with IPPay.  And I would greatly question who is the
>>>>>> enforcement of Visa’s ToS, the merchant or the issuing bank.  I’d lean
>>>>>> heavily towards the issuing bank.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyhow, thanks for the feedback and suggestions of other merchants.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2016 11:35
>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Merchant services
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From: *"Jason Wilson" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>>>> *Sent: *Friday, April 15, 2016 1:22:03 PM
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Merchant services
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott, I am an IPPay client,  email privately your decision to move.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason Wilson
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remotely Located
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 530-651-1736
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 530-748-9608 Cell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> www.remotelylocated.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Authorize.net <http://authorize.net>?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Scott Vander Dussen
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> > Without all the nasty details, I'm completely done doing business
>>>>>> with IPPay. Any recommendations for alternatives?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > 'S
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Sent mobile!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Chuck
>>
>

-- 
Regards,
Chuck

Reply via email to