The Globalstar proposal has a few problems. It will interfere with the upper end of channel 11. The FCC is going to require (at least in the current proposal) that Globalstar use WiFi protocols (whatever that means exactly.
The bigger 'policy' issue is that the FCC will be letting Globalstar essentially privatize WIFi and charge for access to the spectrum, while intruding and creating additional noise at the upper edge of the existing 2.4 band. The 'testing' that Globalstar has done (very one sided) show improved WiFi performance with TPLS enabled, which comes primarily from clients switching to Channel 14, which to the clients is 'clean', while channel 11 throughput drops due to interference from 14. It's just a small monthly fee, what is there to object to? Mark Radabaugh Amplex 22690 Pemberville Rd Luckey, OH 43447 419-261-5996 > On Jun 19, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.cio.com/article/3085399/the-fight-over-a-new-wi-fi-channel-is-coming-to-a-head.html?google_editors_picks=true
