If I remember right, the 3 GHz integrated panel versions are 130M.
From: George Skorup Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 10:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450d vs reflector The 450d gets a free upgrade 40Mbps with 14.1.1+. I'm guessing they didn't do that with the 3GHz integrated panel SM. Haven't bought any. On 6/28/2016 10:13 PM, Daniel White wrote: Personally I like them. Reflectors and the classic Canopy case SM’s are certainly more popular though. There are a number of WISP’s that buy them though. I think the 4 pack and only 20Mbps/Unlimited keys turns some people off. Daniel White Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales ConVergence Technologies Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of timothy steele Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 4:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450d vs reflector Looks like power and gain are the same but the 450d has more of a narrow antenna pattern then using a dish so I would expect to see better results don't have 1 to try though.. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016, 5:55 PM Jon Langeler <[email protected]> wrote: Someone bought one that's not government? Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Jun 28, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Has anyone compared a PMP450d to a PMP450 5ghz SM with reflector? I > have a problem CPE I need just a bit more gain and wandered if that > will get me over the hump. > > What about a 3.65 SM with reflector vs the PMP450 3.6 with integrated antenna? Virus-free. www.avast.com
