But if you're doing that, wouldn't it make a lot more sense to just use DHCP on the customer's side? unless there's some reason they have to be using PPPoE... but I can't imagine what that would be.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > Correct, but you can control what ip you hand out. So yes you can do a DMZ > on that unit, just have to use the nat system .. no biggy, but yes, it can > be a client and server. > > > > [image: DennisBurgessSignature] > > www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – [email protected] > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Friday, July 15, 2016 11:18 AM > *To:* af <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PPPoE Client and Server > > > > If I'm understanding what you want to do right, no... that wouldn't work. > It would have to hand out a different IP. > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Matt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Is there anyway to make a Mikrotik act as a PPPoE client and server? > > I want the Mikrotik to obtain a connection with a static IP from a > PPPoE server on say Port1. I want it to act as a PPPoE server on > Port2 and hand out that exact same IP with PPPoE to a client on Port2. > > If your wondering why its a PPPoE client router that will never redial > if the connection is dropped and occasionally we need to update things > or have a registration drop on the SM. Offered to do a DMZ but there > not so open to that. > > >
