Yes, I understand that general definition

But is there formal definition? I shoot a wireless link to my folks house
across the street, they pay me a fee to access my home network resource
including internet access. The questionable legality aside, do I meed the
definition of BIAS at that point? both curbsides are utility ROW in front
of our house as well as the patch under the road between our houses, Id
love to be able to run fiber to them, even better if it were legal

Not being a smart ass, genuinely curious if the grey area has been defined
or tested anywhere yet.

Is there some form my boss filled out a long time ago with some agency that
formally made him and ISP?

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

> You.
> Basic Internet Access Provider.
> An ISP.
>
> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:51 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] BIAS ROW Acess
>
> What formally defines BIAS provider?
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Well, depends on who owns the ROW.  Yes, generally you have to get
>> permission unless there is a public utility easement already there.  If the
>> power company got a ROW from the property owner that ROW will not extend to
>> you unless you are attaching to their poles and paying them a pole
>> attachment fee.
>>
>> *From:* Jason McKemie <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:37 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] BIAS ROW Acess
>>
>> It's 400 pages.  I tried a search in the document for right-of-way and
>> found one match for a Section 224 of the Commission's associated procedural
>> rules, but can't find much else.  Basically, I'm trying to have a pole
>> placed by the power company in a ROW near a road - they already have poles
>> nearby.  They're asking me for an easement from the property owner.  I'm
>> thinking that shouldn't be necessary in this situation.  Am I wrong?
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> It is written into the FCC order from 2015.
>>>
>>> *From:* Jason McKemie <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:15 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] BIAS ROW Acess
>>>
>>> Does anyone have a link to anything official which states that a BIAS
>>> provider has access to the ROW along with other utilities?  I'm having
>>> trouble finding the actual order.
>>>
>>> Also, even though we would have ROW access as a BIAS provider, would a
>>> specific easement from the adjacent property owner still be necessary since
>>> there is a ROW in place already?
>>>
>>> -Jason
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>



-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to