What sort of difference were you seeing? Double? Triple? More? On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote:
> I should mention that the comparison was for > > a) paying a utility pole contractor to deliver and install a treated pole, > hole boring etc, 55' of pole above ground level, set directly into the earth > > vs > > b) excavation, shoring, re-bar, concrete foundation work etc for a 55' > steel pole > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Never ordered one, but have priced them, for 50' to 55' a >> thicker-than-normal wood utility pole is considerably less costly. Could be >> different in a location that doesn't have a very large and widespread >> timber industry (BC, WA). >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Jason McKemie < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Has anyone ordered a 40 - 50' lightweight Rohn Monopole (or other makes >>> for that matter)? What was the pricing like? >>> >> >> >
