Our V6 only customers need to connect to V4 only destinations. From: Sterling Jacobson Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 3:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] NAT64
Why use NAT64 again? I thought we all just route out IPv6 blocks to customers on DHCPv6, no NAT required. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 3:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] NAT64 Still searching for a good solution to go IPV6 only with the subs. Takes a pretty expensive piece of hardware at the core router to do NAT64 in a carrier class manner. If anyone has suggestions I am anxious to learn.
