yeah, for that you really want an internal https/web interface mediawiki,
confluence or similar server. Create a page for every POP and have a
thorough section describing how it's organized physically, and at OSI
layers 2 and 3.



On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:

> Those features are valuable but I kind of want this the be a "user manual"
> type system only for our entire wisp.  I want our techs to have access to
> everything that is currently rattling around in my brain.  So basically a
> brain dump of all things wisp from me to the rest of the staff.
>
> -Sean
>
>
> On Friday, August 5, 2016, Jesse Dupont <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> NIPAP is great because it keeps track of the hierarchy in tree form,
>> which is invaluable for v6 (which it supports fully).
>>
>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> NIPAP might be way more than you need for IP address tracking. It's meant
>> for big ISPs that have multiple people doing stuff simultaneously with
>> their 10.0.0.0/8 and 172.16.0.0/12 space, and handles multiple VRFs.
>>
>> Also stuff like creating "pools" for new assignments that can be run
>> through an automation system, eg: "We need a /25 sized pool for the dhcpd
>> serving this segment of GPON customers".
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Faisal!
>>>
>>> so far i-doit is the closest to the type of documentation system i'm
>>> looking for.  it's still very data center oriented but it looks like it can
>>> be made to accomplish what i need.
>>>
>>> NIPAP is a confusing set of acronyms that i have no i idea where to
>>> begin with even understanding what it does.  it seems like something that
>>> would replace IPPLAN.  their entire web page is all acronyms :-/
>>>
>>> confluence seems more like a group project/task management that also
>>> does some documentation.
>>>
>>> -sean
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I share your sentiment and pain....and there is a lot you are leaving
>>>> out ...related to keeping track of other bits of related information,
>>>> keeping it updated on a regular basis....
>>>>
>>>> after trying lots of things... we are getting ready to pull the trigger
>>>> on this...
>>>>
>>>> https://www.i-doit.com/en/
>>>>
>>>> It's a German Company... but the product is very interesting, very
>>>> flexible, and may get you thinking on a few other section of the business,
>>>> how you keep info, organize info etc.
>>>>
>>>> Do keep us posted on what you end up with.
>>>>
>>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>>
>>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *From: *"Sean Heskett" <[email protected]>
>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, August 4, 2016 6:20:09 PM
>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] network device map/wiki/management/database/d
>>>> ocumentation        system
>>>>
>>>> Hey guys and gals,
>>>> I don't know if something like this already exists so i thought i'd ask
>>>> y'all before i went and created it. I basically need a complete
>>>> documentation system for our network infrastructure.
>>>>
>>>> -we have our network mapped in visio
>>>> -we have our network monitored in intermapper
>>>> -we have our network graphed in cacti
>>>> -i'm working on creating a wiki type page for all devices that has some
>>>> static info (like date put in service, a link to it's manual) and some
>>>> dynamic info (like Tx frequency)
>>>> -the devices all typically have a web config page
>>>>
>>>> I want to turn our visio maps into HTML so that you can click on the
>>>> device and bring up it's wiki page that either links to all the other pages
>>>> or includes the info on that wiki page etc.
>>>>
>>>> it seems like this is probably just a custom documentation database.
>>>> When i search on the google there are systems kind of like this but they
>>>> seem to be either too narrow minded (geared towards data center and server
>>>> infrastructure) or too broad...nothing seems to be "just right"
>>>>
>>>> does something like this currently exist?  what do you use to keep
>>>> track of all this information?  what would you recommend?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> -Sean
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to