Not familiar with the PTP450's but on the 230's and 100's you could only
set CIR in the PTP firmware (eg., 28 would be the _minimum_ they'd push
instead of the desired maximum).
I'm fairly positive when I evaluated a pair back when they first came out
they still couldn't do MIR (kinda dumb), but we never did install anymore
and perhaps firmware updates since do allow this now.

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:

> It was showing 60 Mbps going through all the interfaces all the way to our
> feed (3 routers), and we are measuring the ethernet to his router, so I
> assume it is all going through.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 8/14/2016 9:22 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> 60 megs hitting the SM or just 60 megs inbound before the QOS?
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Bill Prince" <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> *To: *"Motorola III" <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Sunday, August 14, 2016 11:19:30 AM
> *Subject: *[AFMUG] QOS on PTP450?
>
>
> We have an account that has a 24x24 dedicated connection on a PTP450. We
> set the QOS on the slave to 28x28 to account for slop, but noticed this
> weekend we noticed him running a 60 Mbps download for almost the whole day.
>
> Does the QOS actually work on the PTP450, or do we need to do something
> external?
>
>
> --
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to