A note about smaller cells... There are two types of WISPS out there, those
who try to service every customer from one giant tower, (typical distance
between 2-10 miles) and the other type that trys to put internet on every
grain leg in existence with small cells maybe 2-3 miles apart. I happen to
have done the later which looks like will end up benefiting me after many
years because i already have the infrastructure setup for it. I could
basically setup an A5 omni on every grainleg i am on and offer 75+% of my
customer base 100 meg packages. I can see this killing off my competition
that is struggling to give 1mbps packages on their GIANT tower. I could
also use the A5 for micro repeater sites on other customers TV towers to
hit that other 25% of the customers that don't have LOS to the grainlegs.

I am thinking about coming up with a special contract for the 100meg
packages that basically gives me rights to the customer roof or tower on
every customer that wants to signup for the 100 meg package so that i can
put the micro repeater up when i need to later down the road. This may be a
good way to get existing customers to sign new contract, if you want the
new "wireless fiber" speeds you have to go under a new contract.

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Jaime Fink <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not initially, we're anticipating adding that software feature closer to
> end of year where we introduce cross flexibility/compatibility in the
> platforms.
>
> Jaime
>
> On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:53 AM, Chris Fabien <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Can the C5 connect to B5 in ptmp mode?
>
> On Aug 15, 2016 12:00 AM, "Jaime Fink" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, 2 channels are supported with B5 or B5c clients, B5-Lite clients are
>> also supported at a single channel and are compatible with B5/B5c.
>>
>> You can intermix single and dual channel clients as well if necessary.
>>
>> Jaime
>>
>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Chris Fabien <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Jaime, what are the options for station radios on B5 multipoint? Can this
>> mode support 2 channels like the B5 PTP?
>>
>> On Aug 14, 2016 10:03 PM, "Jaime Fink" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, we're starting testing it now on the A5 so we're roughly 2-3 months
>>> to release.
>>>
>>> B5 multipoint GPS sync should be out in 3 weeks.
>>>
>>> Jaime
>>>
>>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought GPS was like “tomorrow” from Mimosa?  No?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, August 14, 2016 4:36 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP2000 vs. Mimosa A5 deployments
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I wish either one was one step further so the decision was easier. ePMP
>>> 2000 has receive beamforming and sectors and GPS, but is still N based.
>>> Currently Mimosa is AC, but doesn't (yet) have GPS nor any sort of
>>> beamforming. They will, just not now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *"Paul McCall" <[email protected]>
>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>> *Sent: *Sunday, August 14, 2016 1:19:21 PM
>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] ePMP2000 vs. Mimosa A5  deployments
>>>
>>> New towers.... which would you choose?
>>>
>>> (assuming inventory is in stock)
>>>
>>> We have a couple new towers... each connected with lots of BW and we
>>> have to compete with the cable company somewhat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to