That's true.  But AP1 can talk to ports 3-12.  As could AP2 talk to ports
3-12.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Ty Featherling <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Luthman what are you expecting port isolation to do? If I enable isolation
> on two ports that both feed APs then clients on AP1 cannot directly
> communicate via L2 with clients on AP2. They have to go to the router first
> where they can be firewalled. It works like Client Isolation on the APs but
> across the switch. I use it too and like Cassidy said it keeps bridge
> tables tidy and keeps broadcasts contained.
>
>
>
> -Ty
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> On the AP (wireless deal) it works like you would think.  None of the
>> stations/CPE/SM see each other.
>>
>> Netonix port isolation does NOT have the same behavior.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> ...but not if you have client isolation enabled in the AP, right?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sort of.  If you have ISO on CPE1, CPE2+ all still get the traffic from
>>>> CPE1.
>>>>
>>>> CPE  being a wireless SM connected to an AP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For ISO think of APs on a tower.  Each AP has ISO enabled so they cant
>>>>> talk to each other, MAC addresses dont pollute each AP’s bridge table, 
>>>>> etc.
>>>>> I have ISO disabled on the backhaul/router since it needs to talk to
>>>>> everybody.    Enabling this cut down on huge mac table sizes on each AP at
>>>>> a site with a lot of APs and a lot of customers.
>>>>>
>>>>> DS is DHCP snooping.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <image.png>
>>>>>
>>>>> MC is multi cast
>>>>> ISO is isolation, think client isolation on a wireless AP (though the
>>>>> ports excluded from ISO still get the traffic from isolated ports - it's
>>>>> really weird, seems pointless).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Like point to or hover the cursor over?  I am not getting any of
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:53 AM
>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Netonix
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a switch.  There's a long Youtube video for a bunch of things.
>>>>>> It's pretty intuitive IMO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you point to ISO/PS/DS it'll tell you what they are with alt text.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any good manual or online guide to explain all the options is these
>>>>>>> switches?
>>>>>>> I can presume a check box with MC may be a multicast filter but that
>>>>>>> is just a guess.
>>>>>>> Lots of options.  ISO?  PS?  DS?
>>>>>>> I am not a router guy so some of these may be obvious those “skilled
>>>>>>> in the trade” but not to me.
>>>>>>> Details about the flow control options etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can go to their forum and search for questions like this but there
>>>>>>> really needs to be a manual or context sensitive help on the gui or
>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>> I press F1 and get help for my browser.  I see no help buttons.  The
>>>>>>> CLI has the normal ? help things but super terse as usual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to