Yes. It can send to 7 different clients simultaneously. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 12:45:41 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa seminar 




I remember them saying 450m will do 500+ Mbps in a 20 MHz channel (assuming 
dense deployment), doesn’t that mean they are doing beamforming and MUMIMO in 
transmit also? 




From: Mike Hammett 
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2016 12:39 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa seminar 


That's where I'm at as well. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 12:15:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa seminar 


IIRC the 450m works in both directions and I know that ePMP 2000 is uplink to 
the AP only. 

Jeff Broadwick 
ConVergence Technologies , Inc. 
312-205-2519 Office 
574-220-7826 Cell 
[email protected] 

On Sep 3, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 





The ePMP implementation or the PMP implementation? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Rory Conaway" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 12:10:20 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa seminar 



I’m saying the Cambium implementation is receive only. I understand the 
reasoning on the cost side but the cost/benefit? Clever but weird but because 
of the FCC rules, I understand the concept. However, if you were going to do 
it, they should have made it bigger with more gain. 

Rory 

From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds 
Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 9:02 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa seminar 



I mean, there are benefits to receive, sure... but I don't think I've never 
seen a large mimo implementation that didn't have both rx and tx benefits 
though. 



On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Rory Conaway < [email protected] > wrote: 


Isn’t the 14x14 MIMO receive only? 

Rory 

From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza 
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 6:25 PM 
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa seminar 

That was yesterday at Epcom in El Chuco.... We are in Albuquerque today...he is 
a great presenter. 



On Sep 2, 2016 1:19 PM, "Daniel White" < [email protected] > wrote: 


Say hi to Daniel for me. 

I have to say though 4x4 Mu-MIMO and beamforming seems tame now that 14x14 
Mu-MIMO with beamforming is shipping next month from Cambium. 

I’m excited to see these products go head to head. 

Daniel White 
Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales 
ConVergence Technologies 
Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 
[email protected] 




From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza 
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 11:29 AM 
To: Animal Farm < [email protected] > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa seminar 

Beam forming ese 



On Sep 1, 2016 7:04 PM, "Jaime Solorza" < [email protected] > wrote: 
<blockquote>

Pretty impressive seminar... The presenter knows RF very well. It was 
refreshing as he and attendees were all knowledgeable which led to meaningful 
questions and responses. It was cool to see my friends back haul in action that 
he shared with group via cloud. It's an 8 mile link pushing through lots of 
noise. I learned some things today. If you have a chance to attend a seminar 
even if you never intend to deploy Mimosa, you will not be disappointed. 
Mu-MIMO 4x4 is a whole different animal... For you veterans, imagine a CyLink, 
WaveAccess and Orthogan combination.... 



        
        
Virus-free. www.avast.com 



</blockquote>


Reply via email to