80 is in a future firmware release hahahahahhahahahahahahhaha

lolz

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is 56 MHz.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:58:44 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11
>
> I doubt in the year 2016 ubnt would design/build/ship a product that only
> does 56 MHz ETSI size channels for an FCC/IC market...  60 and 80 are
> allowed now. Coordination results permitting, of course.
>
> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-122A1_Rcd.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> They're only 56 MHz wide.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:43:38 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11
>>
>>
>> 1024QAM, dual polarity, 80 MHz wide channels?
>>
>> I am hopeful it won't suck.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> https://fccid.io/SWX-AF11FX
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to