Yeah... uplink appears to still always be at 100% in 3.0 also.
Percentage still isn't available via SNMP, is it? On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, at least in the UI, uplink frame utilization is always reported as > 100% in 2.6.1. I haven't actually looked at the raw numbers via SNMP. > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> So what I am hearing is I am reading the correct values but Uplink does >> not read correctly? >> >> Gilbert >> >> On 9/12/2016 1:59 PM, Josh Baird wrote: >> >> Oh, and the uplink frame utilization values are not correct.. at least in >> 2.6. I haven't tried 3.0 yet. >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am trying to identify congestion on my ePMP radios and am getting >>> weird numbers. I am trying to find out how others monitor congestion. >>> >>> I am monitoring the following MIBs... >>> >>> ulWLanTotalUsedFrameTimePerSecond >>> ulWLanTotalAvailableFrameTimePerSecond >>> dlWLanTotalUsedFrameTimePerSecond >>> dlWLanTotalAvailableFrameTimePerSecond >>> >>> I figure if you divide the used by the total available I should get a >>> frame utilization. Downlink gives me a number, but on uplink, the two >>> values are almost identical. >>> >>> Am I monitoring the wrong thing? >>> >>> Gilbert >>> >>> >> >> >
