I believe Alphoplus2 does that as well, nice thing about aggregating with
ags20 is you can use it with different frequency radio heads(Obviously it
would require seperate dishes on each end).


Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291


On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Daniel White <afmu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually the Ceragon IP-20C/820C supports this at the modem level.  30MHz
> channel on one core and 40MHz on the other.
>
>
>
> I don’t know if SIAE does.
>
>
>
> Daniel White
>
> Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales
>
> ConVergence Technologies
>
> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
>
> dwh...@converge-tech.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2016 1:04 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Any Licensed MW gear doing Channel Aggregation?
>
>
>
> You can't "bond" two things that are totally different radios and speeds,
> what you can do is establish router traffic across each link between IP
> interfaces and balance the traffic load equally.
>
> The only things that can be actually bonded, using vendor specific
> proprietary magic, are where you have two identical radio paths with
> exactly the same speed/FEC/configuration, and the vendor supports it (such
> as an 80 GHz link between two 60cm dishes, two orthomode transducers, four
> radio units, and both H and V polarities).
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> We were looking at bonding a Mimosa B11 and Mimosa B5 to start.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2016 9:27 AM
> *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Any Licensed MW gear doing Channel Aggregation?
>
>
>
> I was thinking on channel aggregation on the RF level, where a MW radio
> could tx on 2 licenses ...
>
>
>
> not counting mimosa b11 as it a hdx radio and throughtput is lost there
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> We were looking at this exact problem.  My starting point is Peplink but
> the costs are very, very high.  The problem is not only dissimilar speeds
> but the fact the links might changes speeds for interference issues, etc…
> Peplink was the only thing that I’ve seen can handle that environment.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:45 AM
> *To:* Animal Farm
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Any Licensed MW gear doing Channel Aggregation?
>
>
>
> I got  paths were we have several licenses for 30 mhz  and 40 mhz
> channels, any gear supports channel aggregation?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-2270-c?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2270-c>
>  Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-2270-c?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2270-c>
>

Reply via email to