I wonder what LTE would do with the same RSSI. From: Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 2:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz PMP450i :: Any real numbers?
Oh I also have somebody with a -88 who gets about half that. 900 was the last ditch effort for both of these. With wimax from the same tower we got a big fat nothing at both locations. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: 9/23/2016 4:44:21 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz PMP450i :: Any real numbers? On the other end of the quality spectrum: Link Test with Bridging VC Downlink Uplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive Actual Actual 19 6.07 Mbps 1.32 Mbps 7.39 Mbps, 474 pps 821 (410 pps) 128(64 pps) That's a -85 on a 5mhz channel. On any wider channel I lose this guy. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Dave" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: 9/23/2016 4:17:36 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz PMP450i :: Any real numbers? This is from one of ours Current Results StatusStats for LUID: 3 Test Duration: 5 Pkt Length: 1714 Test Direction Bi-Directional RF Link Test VC Downlink Uplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive Actual Actual 19 26.13 Mbps 6.78 Mbps 32.92 Mbps, 2367 pps 2389 (477 pps) 9450(1890 pps) Efficiency Downlink Uplink Efficiency Fragments count Efficiency Fragments count Actual Expected Actual Expected 100% 255254 255254 78% 84124 66231 Link Test ran on 03:59:48 01/09/2011 UTC Currently transmitting at: VC 19 Rate 8X/8X MIMO-B On 09/23/2016 03:12 PM, Bill Prince wrote: We're looking at doing a forklift on a couple of 900 MHz FSK APs. What are real world throughput numbers that any of you pioneers are getting? We would probably want to do 10 MHz channels at first, and I would hope that we could get > 15 Mbps in download, but maybe I'm being too conservative? The places we are looking at do not have Smart Meter issues. -- bp part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com --
