Agreed! On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nice analogy. > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 9/30/2016 1:17:57 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Not to start a war... > > > if money doesnt go to both staff and hardware, money isnt a good thing to > throw at it. Underpaid, overworked, under-qualified staff end up standing > confused poking themselves in the eye looking at the cobblefuckery on the > network. you can hand the best gear in the world to a guy, if hes just > poking himself in the eye its not going to do any good. If you have a good > team, you can do more with less, like ubnt, but if you have a good team AND > good gear you can do great things and nobody gets poked in the eye > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> No doubt there will be plenty of poorly run and designed (and may already >> be) ePMP and Mimosa networks, but I suspect that the majority of those >> networks will always be UBNT and maybe some MikroTik, simply because if >> you're comparing price and the specs that most people without a lot of >> experience are going to care about, Cambium looks like a pretty poor value >> in comparison, even with ePMP - as in "Why would I pay $100+ for a Force >> 200 and only does 200Mbps, when I can get a LiteBeam AC that does 450Mbps >> for like $60?". You probably aren't going to understand why things like GPS >> sync, and most of the things Cambium does better, matter until you try to >> run a fairly large network - and in a lot of cases they really don't matter >> until the network grows to a certain point, which makes UBNT a fine >> choice... in a lot of cases probably even the best choice. >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> To add to this, there's a lot of poorly run UBNT networks out there >>> simply because the price made the equipment more accessable. >>> >>> I'm sure there's a fair share of poorly designed cambium networks as >>> well, but likely not as many (more money in the company, higher % of >>> experienced professionals, etc). >>> >>> I'm sure there will be just as many poorly designed and ran ePMP and >>> Mimosa networks given time :) >>> >>> On Sep 30, 2016 11:08 AM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> ohhh… good conversation in my opinion. >>>> >>>> I came from a pure Cambium/Moto shop and now work with a company that >>>> is pure ubiquiti … but i’m not hands on with that side of the shop …. would >>>> say with everything I’ve seen from a distance that I really miss Cambium >>>> gear ;) >>>> >>>> >>>> > On Sep 30, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Sam Morris <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Knowing what you know, if you were starting a WISP, based solely on >>>> performance and manageability, if you had to be 100% one or the other would >>>> you select Ubiquiti or Cambium 450x for your APs and CPE/SM hardware >>>> (leaving the backhaul out of the discussion)? >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > Sam >>>> >>>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > >
