Well said … KISS is very key for those kinds of sites….

Originally, people used to think that because everyone’s Internet connection 
was dial up or “slow high speed” that loading graphs and a lot of code was a 
problem .. then along comes “higher speed high speed” and suddenly the world 
got into bulky home pages that have 20+ external calls, analytics/tracking code 
and a whole raft of other shit … 


> On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:15 PM, Robert Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Netscape, back in the day was the front end to the top 5 search engines and 
> we distributed search queries in a round robin unless people put a preference 
> in their settings.   We had some glue that let us know how fast people went 
> to an end site so we could rate the search engines internally.. (hedging our 
> bets and power in the negotiations with the engines)...  The interesting 
> thing was the simpler the search engine interface the more it got hit.   
> Google is slowly getting worse and worse on the front page.   Yeah it's 
> valuable, the top page, but Yahoo went down the rat hole faster and faster as 
> the front page got trashed.   IF you go to google now on a slow link it just 
> plain dies because of all the hidden sh.t...   KISS was the most important 
> thing back then and I would venture that it is now.   What is disappointing 
> is that the search engines aren't really getting any more intelligent.  
> Google made so much progress because they could "sell" search results and 
> monetize what was not monetized before.   The actual results for finding 
> something not obvious is still garbage...  Natural Language searches are 
> still infantile...  There is a lot of room for improvement in getting a 
> better search language.
> 
> On 10/27/2016 03:36 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
>> About 5+ years ago, I had a friend that built a search engine front end.
>> You would input your search, and it would query Google, Yahoo, MSN and a
>> few others, and then based on the results from all of them, rank the
>> results you would see based on how the other engines saw the world. It
>> was very fast and actually produced some amazing results.
>> 
>> He never did anything with it, and I'm pretty sure it has since died a
>> slow death. Google has the majority of searches now because everyone
>> knows the name, everyone references it (even on TV shows, movies,
>> etc)... and it's a unique name that everyone remembers. It's also easy
>> to type on a keyboard. LOL
>> 
>> Travis
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/27/2016 4:26 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
>>> Interesting and thanks…
>>> 
>>> Have you ever tried Gigablast for example?  (www.gigablast.com
>>> <http://www.gigablast.com>)   It’s a great example in my opinion of an
>>> “alternative” search engine that typically provides good results … I
>>> also find that DuckDuckGo (www.duckduckgo.com
>>> <http://www.duckduckgo.com>) providers better results on searches than
>>> Google.
>>> 
>>> The challenge is that everyone is so used to Google whether it’s
>>> actually better or not - it’s the benchmark to beat sometimes…..
>>> 
>>> Thanks again,
>>> Paul
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 6:13 PM, Simon Westlake <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The only way I would use something else would be if it offered me
>>>> something beyond what Google does. I've tried others, and the search
>>>> results are often inferior, or the same, which doesn't leave me with
>>>> much reason to use anything other than Google.
>>>> 
>>>> I'd happily use a better product if it was offered, but I think
>>>> that's probably a tall order.
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/27/2016 4:07 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
>>>>> Hey folks… I’ve been trying to figure out lately where to ask this 
>>>>> question ….
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have a long time hobby of working around search engines … actually 
>>>>> building them, coding them, scaling them etc…. various open source, 
>>>>> homebuilt, and commercial offerings I’ve used….
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is probably 20 years I’ve been “dabbling” in this space and seen a 
>>>>> huge change in how search engines are perceived, utilized etc….
>>>>> 
>>>>> My question that I’m looking for feedback on, knowing that this group is 
>>>>> extremely good at feedback is this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> When you use a search engine, do you ever think of using something other 
>>>>> than Google?  (ie. Bing, Duckduckgo)
>>>>> Do you feel a search engine that is country specific is something that 
>>>>> you would go out of your way to use … or just use whatever is in your 
>>>>> browser and don’t care?
>>>>> Is privacy of what you search for on a search engine of concern at all?
>>>>> 
>>>>> thanks - this helps me a great deal …
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’m considering launching a project involving a search engine and 
>>>>> challenged with what it’s primary focus should be …. :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Simon Westlake
>>>> Skype: Simon_Sonar
>>>> Email:[email protected]
>>>> Phone: (702) 447-1247
>>>> ---------------------------
>>>> Sonar Software Inc
>>>> The future of ISP billing and OSS
>>>> https://sonar.software
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to