Can’t disclose due to NDA … but their model is based on number of “legs” or connections used so pretty much a pay as you grow concept …
Nice guys - drop them a line (or reach out to me offline and happy to intro) Thanks, Paul > On Nov 8, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote: > > Costs??? > > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Paul Stewart <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > It’s an end to end solution …. CPE you can choose to use whatever you want - > a lot of people use Lanner boxes for example (or PC Engines). They have a > list of “suggested” CPE equipment. > > it runs on Debian 8.x images > > On the ISP side, there are aggregation and management server(s). Again, > Debian 8.x based - they supply ISO images with their magic sauce included > > So it’s not just a CPE device that fails over etc .. it’s actually (in my > opinion) a very slick complete solution - I have it deployed to my house and > works better than anything I’ve ever used in the past… I can even keep a VOIP > call up and take a connection offline with zero issue > > Paul > > > >> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Gino Villarini <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> Anyone resells them? What kind of cpe is used? >> >> On 11/8/16, 9:00 AM, "Af on behalf of Jon Bruce" <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> on >> >> >> >> Gino Villarini >> >> President >> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 >> >> <aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png> >> >> behalf of [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> >Same here, great support too >> > >> >On 11/7/2016 4:40 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: >> >> Works extremely well Š really like their systemŠ. >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Nov 7, 2016, at 4:06 PM, Christopher Gray >> >>><[email protected] >> >>><javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Is anyone running MultApplied on the east coast? >> >>> >> >>> [Any recommendations for other bonded Internet solutions at a >> >>>reasonable cost?] >> > >
