2.6.2.1 is the best for DFS, but otherwise 3.1 or 3.2 would be best.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:26 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, 2.6.2.1 still seems to be the most stable. > > On 12/5/2016 1:35 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > It's kind of a shot...or short? > > Make sure you're in 2.6.2.1 for DFS. 3.0 and 3.1 have DFS issues. I > didn't know this 3.2 came out this weekend, not sure if DFS was fixed along > with elevate being added. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1.8 miles is kind of short at 5 GHz. What kind of RSL are you talking >> about? You can create your own DFS hits if the power is set too high. >> >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 12/5/2016 11:02 AM, Nate Burke wrote: >> >>> I just installed an EPMP link in PTP mode running due north/south about >>> 40 miles west of Chicago. I put it in 5.4 since the spectrum was >>> completely clear. It continually is moving frequency (every couple hours) >>> from DFS Events, is that normal? Before I had multiple frequencies enabled, >>> it would go out of service for hours at a time. >>> >>> The Radio can also be working, then when I put it under load with like a >>> linktest from the SM, it immediately detects radar and shutsdown. >>> >>> EPMP 5 ghz GPS units on both ends, Force 110 dishs. 1.8 mile link >>> distance 3.2 firmware. 20 and 40mhz channels tried. >>> >>> I've always been afraid of running in 5.4 for this reason, where things >>> will just stop working. Apparently my worries were justified. Or is >>> something else going on? >>> >>> >>> >> > >
