$xx,xxx,xxx.xx :/
On Dec 12, 2016 7:03 PM, "Josh Baird" <[email protected]> wrote: > Not for a large 'enterprise,' and the required horsepower really isn't > *that* bad for NPM/NCM/NFA. > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 7:49 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stupid $ :( > > On Dec 12, 2016 6:24 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Very cool! >> >> >> On Dec 12, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sounds similar to our pending NMS... >> >> BMC TrueSight spread across around 8,000 VMs + netapps + infra. >> >> On Dec 12, 2016 6:14 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It really depends …. so in our case, it’s running a dedicated web >>> interface and a pair of pollers. The SQL backend is clustered serving >>> other systems besides just Solarwinds - it’s a *large* cluster running MS >>> SQL Enterprise and NetApp SAN…. it was already existing for other internal >>> systems we utilize…. >>> >>> Previous job, with Solarwinds, we ran 3 dedicated polling engines, a >>> dedicated web front end, and a dedicated server with SQL Standard on the >>> backend >>> >>> The variables are polling frequency (we are 5 minutes), number of >>> nodes/interfaces/volumes etc…. and to some degree number of users hitting >>> the web interface. Also, reports can put a load on the system depending on >>> their complexity and how often they run. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Paul >>> >>> On Dec 12, 2016, at 7:02 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> How big of a windows server farm does it take to scale that thing >>> horizontally? >>> >>> On Dec 12, 2016 5:49 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Rancid at moment - moving to Solarwinds NCM which does pretty much the >>>> same but with a whole bunch of reporting and compliance options, plus >>>> integration with existing network monitoring >>>> >>>> On Dec 12, 2016, at 3:57 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> reviving an old thread >>>> >>>> I put our beta on the network, within 5 minutes of downloading, every >>>> device we want backups for is backed up, we arent a big shop so its less >>>> than 50. >>>> >>>> Even our Fortigates >>>> >>>> I really like this >>>> >>>> alot >>>> >>>> And I hate everything >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Rancid for Cisco and juniper and foundry. >>>>> >>>>> Ubnt ptp radios get their config manually backed up before deployment >>>>> and after each firmware upgrade. Configs saved on a file server and on >>>>> mediawiki instance. >>>>> >>>>> Same with other ptp links. >>>>> On May 27, 2016 4:13 PM, "SmarterBroadband" < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Interested to hear what people use for automatic backups of their >>>>>> network equipment configs. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Mikrotik, Cisco, Zyxel, Ubiquity, Netonix etc… >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We currently use Rancid. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you use? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
