Revisions man, revisions. Ive always thought god a scientist type. Define and control the parameters in the observed environment, then let her rip. Carbon dating is coming to be discovered as questionable as more is learned about it, but thats also assuming that carbon was not altered in any major capacity.
Pull a radio down off the tower after 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, look at the wear and you can guestimate the rough age of any radio, given your knowledge of the environment. Now take one out of an environmental testing lab, how old is it? Arrogance is the primary problem of both science and religion, hypocrisy is the fall of science (i know by facts as applied to my current set of knowledge, I accept that as more knowledge is gained that those fact may change, but that doesnt change the fact that you are wrong) Religion doent have the hypocrisy problem in that regard, because knowledge is replaced with faith. End of the day, knowledge is nothing more than faith in ones ability to interpret, no matter how inaccurate that may be On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > I presume the “we” is the royal we, not your specifically? > > And evolution I presume you are talking the origin of Man, not how we have > a different flu vaccine each year due to the evolving flu virus. > > I mean.... do you personally.... not believe that the flu virus evolves? > > It is pretty much proven. > > *From:* Faisal Imtiaz > *Sent:* Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:11 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - trolling again > > Interesting discussion... If I may join in :) > > From a Muslim perspective.... > > We don't believe in Evolution, believe in Adam & Eve being the first > humans created by God (A Singular Unique Entity), and Jesus being the > Messiah. > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
