http://www.gocomics.com/candorville/2017/01/22
<http://www.gocomics.com/candorville/2017/01/22>
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 1/22/2017 10:36 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
It amazes me that an adult at the top of the political pyramid is so
immature to get butt hurt over the size of crowd that showed up.
Pretty sure D.C. is something like 80% black folk. Having the first
black president is surely something to get stoked about if you are
black, and if you live there, why not make the effort to go see the
show. I wonder if there are crowd size records for all the
inaugurations.
I watched the young pope first two episodes. This reminds me of the
second episode where the pope gets pissed because someone hit in a
laser pointer.
*From:* Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2017 11:22 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
I started reading this: http://www.justfacts.com/
Some of the statistics really rocked my socks.
------ Original Message ------
From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 1/22/2017 1:05:27 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to
effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the
current environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible
data, FOIA responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews
(and yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of
getting information. We know more in real time then the press could
ever package up and present. The current mindset of media in press
conferences is that of militants (both sides of the media isle) and
there is zero professionalism from either one. Neither really gives a
damn what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report whatever their
preconceived response was either way.
Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target?
Answer: Yes
CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100
ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that
those who would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even
during the transition of power.
Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict
day before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a
tumultuous time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory
response.
Had the same attack been authorized today:
CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top
military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to
verify there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed
dead. War crime charges possible?
Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of
100 ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors
of ISIS surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed
by the first white house press briefing and the remarks at
Langley. What an amazing public speaker this one is. Have you
ever had a friend or friend's uncle or something who did too much
meth? You know how they start out with one sentence and then
before you know it they have told fifteen other stories before
they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have four
years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at
the CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the
pain.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds
<[email protected]> wrote:
Can we talk about politics yet? :P
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
