They do offer sync, but I'm not sure what the advantage is of using an 8ms
TDMA window (they support 2ms, 4ms and 8ms)... more capacity, maybe? I have
ours running in Auto, and I'm seeing 1ms average ping times across it.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Why are we looking at 8ms of latency on this radio?  Does it offer sync?
> The website doesn't say.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Traffic Split set to Auto:
>>
>> PHY        1300/1300
>>
>>
>>
>> Traffic Split set to 75/25, 8ms window:
>>
>> PHY        1560/1300
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyone can see why one should prefer setting the Traffic Split to 75/25 –
>> it provides more bandwidth in one direction.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris Wright
>>
>> Network Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:35 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Cc:* Chris Wright
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] B11, TDMA, and TCP
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to compare something with my link...
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you please share what's the listed PHY rates were on your PCN for the
>> link.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Chris Wright" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, January 25, 2017 11:21:12 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] B11, TDMA, and TCP
>>
>> Power is already at the minimum (10dBm) on both sides. 2.2km link.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris Wright
>>
>> Network Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Faisal Imtiaz
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 24, 2017 9:56 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] B11, TDMA, and TCP
>>
>>
>>
>> >SNR 41, 42, 41, 41
>>
>>
>>
>> Turn down your power, and bring the SNR in the 30-35 range...
>>
>> it will improve thruput and allow for the higher modulation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Chris Wright" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:41:37 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] B11, TDMA, and TCP
>>
>> Firmware 1.4.4
>>
>> SNR 41, 42, 41, 41
>>
>> Flow Control had no effect so it remains disabled for now.
>>
>> Sent via mobile phone.
>>
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> What version for firmware is on the radio ?
>>
>>
>>
>> and   What your SNR on the two chains (both directions, i.e. 4 readings).
>>
>>
>>
>> I can tell you that we do not see the behavior you are describing below...
>>
>> But I can also tell you that we had to do some 'tuning' on settings
>> including flow control ..
>>
>> our B11's plug into netonix Switches....
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Chris Wright" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 24, 2017 8:02:58 PM
>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] B11, TDMA, and TCP
>>
>> According to Mimosa, I should be telling my customers that if they’re
>> using the most popular metric in the world for testing internet speeds,
>> they’re doing it wrong (I concede that while this may be technically
>> correct, my customers – and yours too – don’t do technically correct very
>> well.”
>>
>>
>>
>> When TDMA is set to 75/25, 8ms window, MAC Tx/Rx is 980/290. This gives
>> me as much Tx bandwidth as I require for peak times, but no one client IP
>> can download more than 20mbps of TCP traffic (from my speedtest.net at
>> the edge, nor anyone else’s beyond my edge).
>>
>>
>>
>> When TDMA is Auto, MAC Tx/Rx is 780/780 (lower Tx, which is undesirable
>> as it’s 100mbps shy of what I need during peak hours), but TCP throughput
>> per client is greatly increased (150+mbps).
>>
>>
>>
>> So I’m in a pickle. Either my scrupulous customers can get those coveted
>> speedtest.net results they love seeing as they run them every thirty
>> seconds ad-nauseum at the cost of overall Tx capacity of the link. Or I
>> give myself some headroom in link capacity but the fastest speeds my
>> 100mbps clients can see is 20mbps.
>>
>>
>>
>> What’s even stranger is that client upload seems unaffected. I can upload
>> 150+mbps from my test on the link no matter what TDMA is configured. I hit
>> up Mimosa’s chat support was as chipper as they were unyielding in their
>> idea that I should test in a way that caters to the B11’s shortcomings.
>> I’ve been a Mimosa fanboy for a while now but boy am I feeling burned right
>> now.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris Wright
>>
>> Network Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to