I'm 99% sure I've seen the heater run with +4/5 -7/8... I know I've watched
the power draw changing on an RB750UP (which would be +4/5), but there is a
very, very small chance that I had the power pairs swapped.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:49 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
[email protected]> wrote:

> if this is the case, wouldnt 4 cheap diodes always ensure the heater
> polarity is correct?
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I would like some confirmation, because I think that I'm repeating the
>> test now and coming up with different results.  Like the heater isn't
>> kicking on with either polarity now.
>>
>>
>> On 2/10/2017 3:39 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>
>>> You'd think after Trango's miserable experience with preheaters in their
>>> 5830 series radios, no one would do that ever again.
>>>
>>> I know I didn't answer your question, but it sounds like you've already
>>> answered it and are just looking for confirmation.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nate Burke
>>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:13 PM
>>> To: Animal Farm <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP1000 Heater POE Polarity
>>>
>>> I've been running some tests with Cold startup of EPMP1000 w/ sync
>>> Radios.  Does the Internal heater only function with 4/5-  7/8+?  A cold
>>> radio (18F) radio will power on but seems stuck in a reboot loop with 4/5+
>>> 7/8-  The same radio powered on and booted within 2 minutes or so with 4/5-
>>> 7/8+
>>>
>>> Power draw with 4/5+ 7/8- was around 4w, and would randomly spike to
>>> around 15w The power light would stay on, but sync and ethernet lights
>>> would go on and off, like it was continually rebooting.
>>>
>>> Power draw with 4/5- 7/8+ was a solid 15w for about 2 minutes with only
>>> the power light on, then 4w once booted.
>>>
>>> I just presumed that since it would power on with both polarities, the
>>> heater would work with both polarities as well.  It's looking like that
>>> might not be the case.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to