We set our pmp to max 8 miles because we dont use 5.8 for pmp
I have to keep it at 8 to stop an installer from pushing a 8.2 mile, then a
9 mile, then a 10 that happens to connect and pass our lowest speed plan in
the middle of winter. My actual cap is 5 miles, 8 is the installer 3 mile
buffer
most of our cheap links will fall in under the 8 miles, but there are a
couple longer ones. I guess if I keep 5.8 ptp only the only time it would
come into play for sync is with colocated cheap links

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
wrote:

> ePTP definitely has the lowest latency, but I'm not sure how throughput
> compares to TDD in flexible mode... I thought ePTP had slightly better
> throughput too, but I could be wrong about that. Fixed ration TDD is going
> to have the biggest impact on throughput, for obvious reasons... unless the
> link happens to need an up/down ratio of exactly 75/25, 50/50 or 30/70. Of
> course being able to sync things makes that worth it in a lot of cases.
>
> As far as I know, you have to match the distance for sync to work, since
> there aren't really any other timing settings you can play with, like
> Canopy has - I think the only way it can work is if the max distance on
> everything is set for the longest PTP link.
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:28 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We switched from ubnt rockets being our go to cheap link to the force200
>> sonce we use them in pmp.
>> When we started, I ran into some issues, I think it was lower througput
>> in eptp mode, so I left them in TDD.
>> What the current best way to configure these things for lowest latency
>> and what impact to throughput is there?
>>
>> Also, if I throw an EPMP GPS AP up on one side, is there a way to
>> configure the sync to match pmp for longer range on the ptp?
>>
>> --
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>
>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to