Well, no subnet on the destination IP, but there is calculation overhead with IP transit.
On Friday, February 17, 2017, Jason McKemie < [email protected]> wrote: > Destination IP and subnet mask vs. label. > > On Friday, February 17, 2017, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Why do you say “full route”? >> >> >> >> Seems like the lookup is destination IP à next hop. Doesn’t seem like >> rocket science. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Cassidy B. Larson >> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 5:02 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] MPLS >> >> >> >> MPLS is supposed to be “faster” than pure IP routing. It wont have to >> lookup the full route in the route table.. just match the appropriate label >> to the label table. >> >> If that is true on Mikrotik, I couldn’t tell you. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 17, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> We use it for both and then a few more tags for business clients with >> multiple POPs hanging off our network. >> >> >> >> Works great. >> >> >> >> Just want to push the envelope more with my capacity. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 3:36 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] MPLS >> >> >> >> I was debating on whether to just use VPLS for my management traffic and >> then routing customer traffic as normal, or put both in separate VPLS >> instances. >> >> On Friday, February 17, 2017, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I’m using it on 6.38 and so far so good. >> >> >> >> I use it all over and at the core. >> >> >> >> But I’m still experiencing ‘slow downs’ at the VPLS port where I don’t >> get 9Gbps anymore, and it appears to be reduced to 5Gbps and 2Gbps for >> up/down. >> >> >> >> So I’m thinking of reverting back to straight OSPF and VRRP for my main >> customer end routing. >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 1:27 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] MPLS >> >> >> >> I'm starting to utilize MPLS/VPLS at the edge of my network for a >> specific location, but am wondering if there is any reason to not just use >> it all the way back to the core. What are the pros/cons of using MPLS? I >> would think that you could save some public IPs if nothing else. >> >> >> >> Also, has anyone had any issues with MPLS/VPLS on the latest stable >> RouterOS version (6.38.1)? >> >> >> >> -Jason >> >> >> >
