as info, we use powercode, which does reverse-mac authentication. just was hoping we didn't have to move to radius....good to know we don't ;)
----- Original Message ----- From: Nathan Anderson To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:07 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WiMAX, radius and ASN I'm not aware of anything that "must" use RADIUS. It's a convenience to help you scale out provisioning. If you don't want to use it, I'm sure there is a way to statically and manually authorize users on the system. -- Nathan From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 6:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WiMAX, radius and ASN Hmm, I am starting to dabble in this wimax stuff. MUST it use radius? ----- Original Message ----- From: Nathan Anderson To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 7:27 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WiMAX, radius and ASN I would think that would be built into the ASN, and that you would have to consult your specific one's documentation for the details on how to set a second RADIUS server address. -- Nathan From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 3:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] WiMAX, radius and ASN Does anyone have a solution that allows one WiMAX ASN to use multiple radius servers? Failover or load balance.
