Give Darrin crap. From: Sterling Jacobson Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 11:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 Address planning
I had Dennis with LinkTechs plan and deploy my IPv6 using Mikrotik routers/routerboards. I highly recommend Dennis and his team for this, very smooth with the BGP, MPLS and OSPF build for handly IPv6. It just works now, though I’m haven’t fully tested a BGP/partner fail on IPv6 because ONE of my upstreams (caugh caugh CHUCK) doesn’t route IPv6 yet. It is working very well though the one provider, native IPv6, dual stacked of course because the internet sucks and doesn’t host everything in IPv6 yet. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 5:33 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 Address planning More to read/learn. Thanks. Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Paul Stewart Gesendet: Freitag, 17. März 2017 11:58 An: Animal Farm <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 Address planning This answer varies of course …. one thing with ICMPv6 though is to make sure you allow more than just echo/reply … take a look at https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4890.txt On Mar 17, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: Yes we are late but none of our customer needed/wanted ipv6 until now. So now we are considering our address planning for our infrastructure. With IPV4 we use private addresses with small subnets between routers. With IPV6 we are considering using official unicast adresses and a /120 for each subnet. A packetfilter at the Border routers allowing only icmp echo/reply to the /56 containing this infrastructure subnets. What is best practice for a IPV6 addressing in a WISP network?
