Hi Paul, We put all sorts of protections in our leases on private structures, I'm sure you do too. When we were dealing with american tower on a cell phone tower, the most they would approve was a "play nice" clause saying they would basically require any subsequent tower tenant work in good faith to resolve any unlicensed interference issues. It offered no real protection. They clearly did not want to be the frequency police on their towers. Somewhat understandable I suppose.
Not sure this was helpful but that was our experience. Chris Fabien LakeNet LLC On Mar 20, 2017 8:20 AM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected]> wrote: > BUMP 😊 > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Paul McCall > *Sent:* Friday, March 17, 2017 4:56 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Interference clauses in commercial tower leases > > > > Anyone have a clause that they have gotten a commercial tower provider to > include in their contract, for the purposes of frequency protection? > > > > Something that would identify the unlicensed frequencies that you intend > to use, and that you no other new leasee would be allowed to successfully > apply with those frequencies. > > > > We have done this with Crown previously, and I am currently fighting the > issue with a smaller, regional tower group. I would like to have some > references of WISPs who also have these protections. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Paul > > > > Paul McCall, President > > PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. > > 658 Old Dixie Highway > > Vero Beach, FL 32962 > > 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800> > > [email protected] > > www.pdmnet.com > > www.floridabroadband.com > > > > >
