Not cheap and the connectors are about $15 each I think.  But they never fail 
in my experience.  

From: Adam Moffett 
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 9:35 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Splice on Connectors

I just watched a video.  The installation tool for Unicam looks really slick.

It appears to be a mechanical connection with index matching gel.  The same 
vendor pushing SOC's was poo-pooing mechanical connections.  They say the index 
matching gel changes from clear to clearish/brownish as it ages.  The claim is 
that after enough years you start getting a significant attenuation, whereas a 
fusion splice is permanent.  They didn't quantify the loss/year.



------ Original Message ------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: 3/29/2017 11:10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Splice on Connectors

  We use Unicams everywhere.  

  From: Adam Moffett 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 9:01 AM
  To: Animal Farm 
  Subject: [AFMUG] Splice on Connectors

  I have a vendor who's really pimping their SOC's.  The idea is you can splice 
the connector onto a 900um fiber and then plug directly into your electronics.  
No splice tray. 

  So in theory I could put a fan out kit on each buffer tube coming into an 
enclosure and then with SOC's go directly into the switch.  I do have a space 
limitation at the moment (long story), so eliminating splice trays and patch 
panels is sounding really good right now.

  Does anybody love/hate SOC's?  

  Also how does the splice in the SOC not need additional support when a normal 
splice sleeve does? Does the connector body really protect it well enough?

Reply via email to