5GHz through trees? 100% loss at that range. Seriously, I don't know, but I'd be willing to bet that is not going to work well at all.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > for 3.65ghz I've been told 125db / km is typical loss through trees. So I > guess if that's true in your case then you've got 100m or so of trees to > get through. > > I do not know the equivalent number for 5.8ghz. Maybe somebody else can > fill in the blank. > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Christopher Gray" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: 4/17/2017 4:51:23 PM > Subject: [AFMUG] Equivalent Loss When Moving NLOS from 3 to 5 GHz? > > I'm looking doing some calculations for a link that is currently 4.7 miles > effectively with M365 NanoBridges. > > The signal calculates out to -59 dBm, but in reality it is -71 dBm (12 db > loss through foliage). > > Is there a decent way to estimate what the equivalent foliage loss would > be at 5 GHz? > >
