My primary database is the geocoding database from within my GIS software 
Manifold. It uses mostly census tiger file data. One of the ways to increase 
better results is to use the address standardizing tool prior to running them 
through the geocode process. I like this tool because it does allow to look at 
the accuracy of the match and lets me know if I need to run any records through 
other tools to increase accuracy. When I use external geocode tools I do not 
get a match type result back to give me feedback as to the accuracy. I can 
create multiple columns of latitude and longitude and visually look to see how 
close each of the geocode results was from any typical source. All of this can 
be a painful tedious task depending on the number of records. Depending on the 
use of the results sometimes good enough is just that. Working on a batch right 
now where the client wants to make sure their tower and rooftop coordinates are 
precise. They acquired a lot of properties to lease through various sources and 
they are not all accurate. 

 

One thing to remember is that 911 addresses are coded for every 50 feet of road 
frontage. Many geocoding results will spot the address on that sport of road 
frontage, not the actual structure.

 

Other options I have for geocoders are:

In NY state they have created an on line lookup tool based on data they 
compiled with each county and placed addresses on the building rooftops, 
excellent results but specific to that state.

Microsoft MapPoint, this is a direct interface to my GIS software and Microsoft 
does subscribed to the good geocode datasets from a commercial provider

Geocoder.us – this works with my GIS software as an external call to their 
database, slow as it runs one record at a time

Virtual Earth – External call one record at a time.

 

There are other options:

Batchgeocode is nice to be able to load a list if you do not have GIS software 

QGIS has a plugin that uses Google and OpenStreetMap for their geocoding. Those 
sources are not the most refined but for some jobs it’s good enough.

GPS Visualizer.com has the ability to load a file and geocode, they use three 
geocoding databases, Bing, MapQuest and Google. This may puke if you try to run 
too many records through the tool. Some of the free geocoding sites have a max 
records limit per day.

 

 

 

 

 

Thank You,

Brian Webster

www.wirelessmapping.com

www.Broadband-Mapping.com

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Good Geo-Locate tool

 

Curious which ones you recommend. We use a variety of them and it seems to be 
hit and miss with all of them. We typically try a bunch in an area and then go 
with the service that had the best results. It doesn't seem to be very 
consistent with one provider over another in any pattern we can discern.

 

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Brian Webster <[email protected]> wrote:

Send me the list and I can run it through my tool. When you get the results 
back it will also tell you the level of accuracy I was able to geocode. Results 
tell either building meaning exact match, street which means the tool had to 
make an assumption based on the address number and the known number ranges 
between cross road intersections and zip code meaning the address made no sense 
and it was just placed at the zip code centroid. These lets you know how bad 
your list may be with regards to standardized street address data. Depending on 
the source of the data this can be a problem or nice and smooth. 

 

Address geocoding in an inexact science, different geocoding tools can give you 
different answers. Cheaper or free tools tend to use the free census tiger file 
maps. Depending on each county 911 address database and their willingness to 
share that data with the world, the census data may work great. If the county 
like to only sell the data or they do a crappy job at 911 addressing 
information, then results are usually less than perfect. Some companies 
actually buy the data and use it for their own mapping tools. Google tends not 
to do this so their geocodes are not always the best. Others that purchase good 
goecode databases from companies who make a living cleaning the data up will 
give better results.

 

Thank You,

Brian Webster

www.wirelessmapping.com

www.Broadband-Mapping.com

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul McCall
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] Good Geo-Locate tool

 

Are there any good (free) online tools to accurately take addresses from an XLS 
or CSV, etc. and put into a KML ?

 

Paul

 

Paul McCall, President

PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.

658 Old Dixie Highway

Vero Beach, FL 32962

772-564-6800 <tel:(772)%20564-6800>   

[email protected]

www.pdmnet.com

www.floridabroadband.com

 

 

 

Reply via email to