Yeah, that's the thing - dual stacking does not work as it is intended because the vast majority of servers in IPv4 land are dragging their feet on adopting IPv6; it does not save providers from IPv4 scarcity.
Chris Wright Network Administrator From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 3:55 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants Nothing at the moment, still dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 Also interested if someone has figured this out with a half decent solution as I need to purchase another /22 this year. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chris Wright Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:51 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants I'm weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction or finding a NAT64 solution that will enable me to start handing IPv6 addresses to customers and know they'll be able to get to IPv4 internet without issue. Mikrotik doesn't seem too concerned with implementing NAT64, so I'd be looking at adding complexity to my network if I go that direction. On the other hand, I don't like spending thousands of dollars on antiquated address space if I can help it. I'd rather do my part in moving IP standards forward instead of staying stuck in the past. What's working for you all? Chris Wright Network Administrator
