We used a CCR1036 to do full routes on dual gigabit BGP peers. Turning up IPv6 with full routes did not seem to change the load at all. I really like the CCR routers.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > We are running OSPF and an EOIP tunnel. Eventually MPLS/VPLS. at this > point, this isn't really a job for Mikrotik is it? The contractor is a > multivendor shop, with a Cisco preference. We just stayed with the > rb1100ahx2 because its what we use throughout the network, we knew it might > be underpowered for this role. > > I assume when we turn up IPV6 it will basically double the demand also > with a second stack running? > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> 1100ahx2 is not a good bgp router, go with a CCR 1036 at min, else >> PowerRouter would be preferred. However, the CCRs can handle it as long as >> you don’t load them with other stuffs. >> >> >> >> >> >> *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * >> >> MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant >> <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – >> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE >> >> >> >> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net >> >> Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com >> >> Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> >> >> E-Mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 10:43 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] rb1100ahx2 bgp load >> >> >> >> We turned up BGP on one of our routers today, 2 peers, full routes, this >> is just one upstream, we will be turning up bgp with another provider >> shortly elsewhere on the network, I assume those tables will make their way >> to this router. >> >> load averaged 4-12% prior to turning up BGP now its running 60-90, even >> occasionally pegged >> >> >> >> is this a matter of tuning BGP and ROS packages, or is this just too much >> for the router? this is only at 150mbps, as we increase capacity I feel we >> have already scaled out of this router if its not a misconfiguration of >> something on my end >> >> >> >> >> >> [image: Inline image 1] >> > >
