Double check the spec sheets please.. 

there are a couple of models which are showing to provide 2A on the 24HV & 48HV 
ports, most of the others are showing to be rated for 1.5A. 

In my experience Chris S. is a stickler, expect exactly what is listed, nothing 
more nothing less :) 

https://www.netonix.com/media/wysiwyg/ws-specsheet.pdf 
(FWIW, I never noticed the Amp ratting on the POE out on the different netonix 
models until your email) :) 

Regards. 
Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 

> From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 7:51:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix POE

> It might be doing that. I will check when I get back to the lab.
> From: Josh Baird
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 5:43 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix POE
> 55v out of what exactly? It seems to me that they have internal DC-DC 
> converters
> to regulate voltage per port You can see this if you go to "status" which 
> shows
> 3V/24V/48V board voltages. As an example, I have several WS-12-250-DC models
> that I'm supplying ~54VDC to, but the 48V board voltage shows ~49VDC.
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote:

>> When I put in 55 I get out 55.
>> From: Rory Conaway
>> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 5:08 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix POE

>> They can take 9-72V and put out 24 or 48V.

>> Rory

>> From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
>> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 4:04 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix POE

>> I don’t think Netonix had a DC-DC, it just puts out what it is fed.

>> From: George Skorup

>> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 4:33 PM

>> To: [email protected]

>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix POE

>> Remember that Forrest's SyncInjector/PowerInjector/RackInjector products 
>> allow
>> 2A per port. But maybe it doesn't matter because of the built-in current
>> protection?

>> Also consider that something like a Medusa could be running on battery power 
>> for
>> >30 minutes. Say 75W @ 44VDC = ~1.71A worst case. I say 75W due to variables
>> (cable length, etc). It's fine if your supply is always 56VDC. I use a lot of
>> Traco BCMU360s which are regulated 48VDC, which then becomes ~1.57A. Well, it
>> dips down to about 46 volts or so when the battery is getting low. I'm sure
>> there are/will be folks wanting to run a 450m on a Netonix. Maybe it doesn't
>> matter because the Netonix internal DC-DC always puts out 54VDC, doesn't it? 
>> I
>> don't know.

>> On 5/19/2017 5:01 PM, [email protected] wrote:

>>> I made a circuit board that fits into the APC rack.� It is an Ethernet 
>>> fuse
>>> board.�� Kinda a belt and suspenders for maximum protection of an CAT5/6
>>> circuit.� If a surge suppressor clamps during a major event, this fuse 
>>> board
>>> will blow to prevent damage to a POE supply.� Have LEDS on 4 of the 8 
>>> pins to
>>> detect blown fuses if it is a POE circuit.�

>>> �

>>> Been tweaking the fuse values for about a month.� Did the first run of the
>>> pre-production part and started testing.� I tweaked the fuses to blow 
>>> about a
>>> bit over 2 amps.�

>>> �

>>> Started doing some long term burn in runs to check thermal considerations
>>> etc.� Had the load dialed in to 2 amps.� Powered by a Netonics doing 54
>>> volts.�

>>> �

>>> It ran for about a half hour before blowing the Netonix port.� They say 2 
>>> amps
>>> surge, 1.5 amps continuous.� I think they actually mean it .� I was 
>>> hoping
>>> it would survive 2 amps continuous, but it will not.� So I have a roll of 
>>> smt
>>> fuses that are worth about $650 that I will not be using unless I release a 
>>> 1.5
>>> amp and a 2 amp version of this product.�

>>> �

>>> RJ45 pins are rated at a half amp each so 2 amps per jack.� 2 amps would 
>>> be a
>>> good generic value.� Not sure whether to offer two different amp ratings 
>>> or
>>> one.�

Reply via email to