6 pairs @ 80 MHz bw 12 pairs @ 40 MHz bw 13 pairs @ 30 MHz bw From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 2:17 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
10.7-11.7 / 2 for duplex channel pairs. I forget exactly how it's laid out, but I think it's something like 5 or 6 pairs for the 80MHz channel plan and 11 or 12 pairs for the 40MHz channel plan. On 5/31/2017 10:58 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: How many usable 11ghz channels are there? I looked on the Mimosa cloud map and only one other 11ghz registered link in my area and it doesn't appear to be in path with any of my towers. On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> wrote: Yep, called links ☺ Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/> Office: 314-735-0270<tel:%28314%29%20735-0270> E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:09 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences We are on TowerCoverage. I did not know it did path calcs. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 9:56 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences Towercoverage.com has done 11ghz for years ☺ From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Hardy, Tim Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:04 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences Found this on ubnt forum - can't comment on accuracy. FYI, we use PathLoss. https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber/New-AF11FX-Link-Calculator/m-p/1741139#M32848 ________________________________ From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net<mailto:li...@sbb.net>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 8:17:46 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences Well I suppose I could, but hell I don’t want to.. 😊 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 2:22 PM To: af <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences I think they have that stuff in airlink, but you can always just look up the spec sheets for all the relevant parts and calculate it manually. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:18 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net<mailto:li...@sbb.net>> wrote: I can use Link Planner to check LOS. But the 820 in Link Planner will have very different radio Tx powers and receive sensitivities. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 1:07 PM To: af <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences I think airlink,ubnt.com<http://ubnt.com> supports 11ghz now, so that can be used to get a fairly good idea of what it's going to do... also, Mimosa's tool is pretty nice. But when you know you have a clear path and what the distance is, it's not very hard to calculate what the link is going to do... frequency planning is done by your coordinator. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:59 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net<mailto:li...@sbb.net>> wrote: Using? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 12:55 PM To: af <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences DIY On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:45 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net<mailto:li...@sbb.net>> wrote: How are you Link Planning your AF11 links? Does UBNT do link Planning? Reseller? DIY? Other?? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 5:43 PM To: af <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences We have one up... other than some very ugly issues right after we put it up (which was apparently a bug in the firmware they shipped with... upgrading to the latest beta firmware fixed it), it has been working perfectly, and I haven't touched it since. The AF11 is certainly worth a look in my opinion, but it all depends on what you need it to do. On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net<mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote: Ignoring a few software bugs and delayed fixes, it's good for '2nd string' links. If this is for high priority link, I'd try SIAE or Cambium. Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. On May 25, 2017, at 2:46 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net<mailto:li...@sbb.net>> wrote: We are looking to add some more Licensed Links to our network. Does anyone actually have the AF11 in service. Is it worth a look? How is it performing for you? Any issues? Just not sure if it is worth considering or should I be looking at existing companied like; Exalt ? Dragonwave ? SAIE ? Or newer ones like Alcoma Cablefree FOR3 Anyone tried the last two? Just looking for best bang for the buck in non core ring usage.
