How about this nanobeam?  Its wafer thin.

[image: Inline image 2]

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

> ....and I would not put anything more on it.
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: 6/6/2017 5:01:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] what is the typical wind load of an 80' telephone
> pole?
>
> It's a 3' dish and six sector antennas.
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: 6/6/2017 3:53:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] what is the typical wind load of an 80' telephone
> pole?
>
> Kind of looks like a 30 inch but you are likely right. That is pretty
> loaded.
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017, 2:31 PM George Skorup <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Not sure why this went direct to Adam and not the list. Probably me being
>> stupid clicking on the wrong button in Thunderchicken.
>>
>> On 6/6/2017 2:25 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>>
>> Holy shit. Is that a 4' dish?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/6/2017 6:12 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>
>> I don't think there's going to be a simple answer to that.
>> You'll need to know what class of pole it is.  I've seen a chart showing
>> the horizontal force that can be applied to a pole based on what class it
>> is, and you could use that to make an estimate.  I think the class is based
>> on the circumference at the tip.  The chart assumed the pole was a Douglas
>> Fir, and it gave a range of values because not every tree is the same.
>>  Then you have to wonder how relevant any of that is if the pole develops a
>> crack or starts rotting.
>>
>> How about at least this much:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]>
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>> Sent: 6/5/2017 11:19:13 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] what is the typical wind load of an 80' telephone
>> pole?
>>
>> This pole is actually 80’ above ground.  I misstated my question.  I
>> meant what is the wind load capacity of the pole to determine how many
>> antennas I can put on it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Christopher Gray
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 5, 2017 4:24 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] what is the typical wind load of an 80' telephone
>> pole?
>>
>>
>>
>> What is the height of an installed 80' pole?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:10 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm impressed you can 80' wooden pole in for $5500.  Here it was closer
>> to $10,000.  Just the pole itself was a few $k.  Transport from the yard to
>> a worksite was $2500.  It's over the length limit for NYS roads, so we have
>> to have escort vehicles and file a plan with the DOT. Some pole contractors
>> didn't even want to do it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2017, at 6:35 PM, Eric Muehleisen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Funny you mention this. I just got off the phone with the power company
>> about the exact same thing. Around here anything higher than 65 ft is
>> considered transmission line pole and gets expensive.
>>
>>
>>
>> $5,500 for 80 ft.
>>
>> $2,500 for 65 ft.
>>
>> $1,000 for 40 ft.
>>
>> that cost includes the pole and labor to plant it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, you can't set a meter on the pole unless they retain ownership or
>> you lease the pole as part of the service. The cost to run lines and/or
>> transformers is on you as well. So plant your pole close to the existing
>> grid.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>>
>> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>>
>> *602-426-0542 <%28602%29%20426-0542>*
>>
>> *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
>>
>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
>>
>>
>>
>> “"Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough
>> features yet."    — Scott Adams
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>


-- 

Carl Peterson

*PORT NETWORKS*

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707

Reply via email to