That's for PCN monitoring of both polarities on a PTP path, or treating each polarity as its own path (as the FCC does)?
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:02 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > The last quote I got from Liz for her frequency protection service was > $50/path/year, $500 minimum. That is very reasonable. > > > On 6/6/2017 9:32 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote: > > I think it was $1200 a year for all my licenses > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017, 7:34 AM Adair Winter <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> How much do you pay comsearch for that? >> >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> In my case it was worth it. We had it through ComSearch but I am sure >>> Liz is just as good. Once you get a few dozen links out there spread across >>> a few hundred miles you get tons of notices. It was taking me hours every >>> week to review all the PCN's I was receiving. I know the service works >>> since in a couple of years ComSearch filed a petition on our behalf when >>> someone tried to file a path that would have interfered. They notified me >>> after via email. >>> >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:14 AM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> I believe Liz Creekmore has a monitoring service. >>>> >>>> I don't know what's involved. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Steve Jones" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 6, 2017 2:11:09 AM >>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] PCN Monitoring >>>> >>>> >>>> First, I guess when the initial request is made, I assume the system >>>> its put into is pretty robust as far as identifying potential harmful >>>> interference, I'm guessing its built on a better safe than sorry algorithm? >>>> >>>> So by the time a PCN makes it to my inbox, what is the likelihood the >>>> proposed link will actually be negative? Is that common in more densely >>>> populated areas? >>>> >>>> And, is there any service one can sign up with to do PCN monitoring to >>>> alert on an actual potential interferer. I get maybe 15-30 a week by email >>>> and 5 or ten by post. I was plotting them all but now they just live in a >>>> folder, I assume that means I fail a due diligence test if there were an >>>> issue >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Adair Winter >> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 >> C: 806.231.7180 >> http://www.amarillowireless.net >> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >> >> >> >
