I've been really impressed with Alpha's support.

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yeah, I manually turned on the inverter and left the input breaker
> tripped/off and it ran on battery for about 2 hours until I went and
> flipped the input breaker switch back on.
>
> It did have an Overload event just prior to the breaker trip, which makes
> some sense I guess.
>
> Not sure there was an actual overload or not, but maybe that's the case.
>
> I have everything with two power supplies split between the UPS on one and
> normal power on the other.
>
> I don't have any devices with problems or reboots on Normal power during
> this so called overload event from the UPS.
>
> So Chuck may be right, the UPS might just be breaking slowly.
>
> I'll give Alpha a call and see what they say.
>
> This particular unit is out of warranty, but I have others that are new.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Skorup
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Alpha UPS AC Input Breaker Open
>
> I have no experience with Alpha stuff, but, stupid question... are you
> sure the batteries are good?
>
> On 6/13/2017 12:00 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
> > Sounds like an internal inverter component is intermittently failing.
> > Most likely an aluminum electrolytic capacitor.
> > It will probably get more frequent until it totally dies.
> >
> > -----Original Message----- From: Sterling Jacobson
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 10:56 AM
> > To: '[email protected]'
> > Subject: [AFMUG] Alpha UPS AC Input Breaker Open
> >
> > I've never seen this before on my UPS, but the AC Input breaker keeps
> > tripping open on my Alpha about once a day.
> >
> > Nothing else in the cabinet seems to be affected.
> >
> > No other equipment seems to report any problems with the AC.
> >
> > I'm not a guru on these things, what would this indicate?
> >
> > Also, when it does this it shuts off power to the AC output on the UPS
> > instead of going on inverter.
>
>

Reply via email to