What product are you talking about that is worse? :) On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
> I hated the PMP320, but I've since learned that it could be worse. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Colin Stanners" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 6/14/2017 9:58:30 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] reading 320 crash reports - cambium guys input > appreciated > > We have some PMP320s in heavy interference - took a lot of tweaking the RF > reliability settings to get the links to be usable, I'm still very > frustrated that the platform was so badly designed that such needed to be > done. I don't think I've ever seen a crash from interference so it could be > something else. > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> These are dead ducks, I know this. >> I would bet however cambium has a nifty tool they used to use that took >> all the data and spit out a wtf report. >> I'm pretty sure I'm seeing random AP reboots from interference, looking >> through the archive a thread from me indicated cambium told me at some >> point in the past if I'm configured upper 3.65 with no failover channel it >> will just crash reboot. I don't have the email chain from them because we >> dumped an exchange server a few years ago. >> This particular AP was doing the thing where CSM would stay connected, >> show connected, but become unresponsive, Ive dicked all I can with the sm >> isolation and aging time workarounds, finally took it to a lower 3.65 >> channel, but left upper enabled, as I understand, this keeps the unit >> abiding by upper 3.65 rules in todays FCC new world order. >> not all that concerned right now about troubleshooting the issue, I just >> really want to get a tool to read the crash reports. >> Cambium, I was a good guy and stole your AP telnet login but never >> released it to the wild, Can you toss a brother a bone here? >> > >
