I built a CO2 powered de icing spray system for one mountain top.  Camera so we 
could see if it was working.  Next time I would use nitrogen.  CO2 carbonated 
the fluid and it did not spray well.  

From: Sean Heskett 
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:35 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Vendor for super high efficiency (Sunpower,etc) PV panels

Really difficult to recharge a 4 week battery bank with only one or two days of 
sunlight before another month of snow and overcast tho.

Generac generators are the best xmas gift I've ever bought for myself ;) 

-sean



On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

  4 weeks of batts will do the job...

  From: Sean Heskett 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:13 AM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Vendor for super high efficiency (Sunpower,etc) PV panels
  When it snows for 4 weeks straight (not kidding) there's no amount of panels 
and batts that can save you.  

  On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:27 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

    90 kWh/mo load is a 123 watt load.  (123*24*30.4)
    123 * 20 = 2460 watts  My rule of thumb for Utah.  Assuming you have 2 
weeks of batts that is all you will need.

    You have 4140 watts of panel.  That is 33X.  No doubt it will work.  
Probably produces usable current in moonlight.  Certainly overcast power.
    During a light overcast you get 5% power.  If you are 20x load, you are 
fully powering the load during overcast.

    Now, in my case, that extra 1680 watts of panel that I would not have 
installed would have paid for the generator and propane tank.  

    So, 33X in WA and BC, 20X in Utah no generator.  10X in Utah with 
generator. (and that is cutting it thin).


    From: Eric Kuhnke 
    Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:34 PM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Vendor for super high efficiency (Sunpower,etc) PV 
panels
    I have to respectfully disagree, in WA and BC the mid winter sunlight hours 
are even fewer. But 12 x 345W panels tilted at 80 degrees facing directly south 
will produce far more than enough kWh/mo for a particular type of site's 
calculated needs, in December and January. Battery voltage monitoring systems 
are set up and a portable generator can be brought to the site if needed during 
those two months.   

    Predicted production is about 247kWh a month in December.

    Load, which is all DC, is below 90 kWh/mo.


    On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:

      Totally agree with Chuck on this line of thought.  Where we are (NW 
ColoRADo) there is no amount of panels + batts you can install for Dec & Jan.  
Propane generator is the only way to keep an off grid site running.  YMMV

      -Sean



      On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:17 PM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

        Remote start propane generator is a much better value for sites like 
this.  In the middle of winter have a low voltage relay trigger the generator.  
Run it just long enough to top the batts.  Usually an hour a day is more than 
enough.  Store enough propane to get through the worst of it.  

        From: Eric Kuhnke 
        Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:00 PM
        To: [email protected] 
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Vendor for super high efficiency (Sunpower,etc) PV 
panels

        I care about efficiency because in some cases space is at a premium. If 
these were going on the roof of a warehouse/office type building I would agree. 
But in a place where it is 4x4 access only, and only in summer, there is a 
scenario where a big ground mount tilted at 80 degrees for off grid will only 
hold 12 x 72-cell panels (2.0 x 1.0m each).  

        Going any bigger than that for square footage of panels and size of 
mount will drive up the cost considerably. The site I am building right now has 
12 x 345W 72-cell panels, and I am looking at a configuration with 12 x 360W 
panels for the next one. The goal is the greatest possible kWh production in 
December and January and additional safety margin for extended periods of 
cloudy days in mid winter. 



        On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

          I use 11 watts per square foot as a rule of thumb.  Never wanted 
efficiency, always wanted low $/watt.

          From: Eric Kuhnke 
          Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:47 PM
          To: [email protected] 
          Subject: [AFMUG] Vendor for super high efficiency (Sunpower, etc) PV 
panels

          Anyone have a favorite vendor source for >21% efficient PV panels 
they'd like to share? 

          I'm looking at various commodity 60 and 72-cell modules made with 
4.95 to 5.0W high efficiency 156mm monocrystalline cells, but the Sunpower mono 
stuff is still better in STC watts per square foot.

          60-cell x 5W = 300W
          72-cell x 5W = 360W


          Of course, willing to pay somewhat of a price premium....

Reply via email to