City of Hamilton On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:22 AM Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote:
> lewis, what city is that project in ohio in? > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I did skim it. I guess you could read it either way but you are likely >> right. Still seems a bit high. I am only familiar with one other Muni dark >> fiber project in Ohio and they are having a difficult time trying to recoup >> their cost and leave enough margin for a provider to take it the last step >> profitably. Who knows; maybe this will work. >> >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am 100% Calix, one hand hole per two homes, 100% underground. >>> >>> *From:* Roger Timmerman >>> *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 9:10 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R >>> >>> We are hitting about $1450 per address passed, and $1000 per home >>> connected all-in expenses. >>> >>> Roger >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I can do a home for about $3500 >>>> >>>> *From:* Lewis Bergman >>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 6:24 AM >>>> *To:* Animal Farm >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R >>>> >>>> Got the title right this time. Man...slightly over $8000 per address >>>> passed. That seems really steep. No wonder nobody wanted to do it. If they >>>> get 80% of addresses passed that is a bit over $10k per customer. >>>> >>>> What is you fiber guys experience overlaying FTTH over non FTTH >>>> delivery? >>>> >>> >>> >> >
