Yeah, I think that's pretty consistent with what the AF-5X radios have always used. The AF5 (not X) and AF24 do use a lot more power.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. All my AF5X use ~10W. UBNT AC use 6W and older MT 11n use 3-4W. SAF > is 30-35. PTP600 is 50. > > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:04:44 +0000 > Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think you are thinking of the AF24 which cranks 50W all the time. >> >> Rory >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke >> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions? >> >> Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC PoE injectors before they >> go out to the field. Something interesting I've noticed, and maybe I'm not >> remembering right, but it seems that the newer AF5X use less power than the >> older ones. >> >> This unit with its ubnt default PoE injector plugged into a kill-a-watt >> is measuring 11 watts. There's no traffic going through it, but as I recall >> an AF5X uses pretty much the same amount whether or not it's under load, >> since the AF architecture is constantly sending/receiving frames whether or >> not they have an ethernet data payload. >> >> >> > ----- GENIAS INTERNET -- www.genias.net ------ > Genias Internet > Stefan Englhardt Email: [email protected] > Dr. Gesslerstr. 20 D-93051 Regensburg > Tel: +49 941 942798-0 Fax: +49 941 942798-9 >
